CasinoScraper Sign In
Argentina · EspañolBelgië · NederlandsBrasil · PortuguêsCanada · EnglishČeská republika · ČeštinaColombia · EspañolDanmark · DanskDeutschland · DeutschDominican Republic · EnglishEesti · Eesti keelEspaña · EspañolHrvatska · HrvatskiIreland · EnglishItalia · ItalianoLatvija · LatviešuLietuva · LietuviųMagyarország · MagyarMalta · MaltiMéxico · EspañolNederland · NederlandsNew Zealand · EnglishNorge · NorskÖsterreich · DeutschPerú · EspañolPolska · PolskiPortugal · PortuguêsRomânia · RomânăSchweiz · DeutschSlovenija · SlovenščinaSlovensko · SlovenčinaSrbija · SrpskiSuomi · SuomiSverige · SvenskaUnited Kingdom · EnglishΕλλάδα · ΕλληνικάБългария · БългарскиУкраїна · Українська
Software studios behind your favourite casino games
Casino Game Provider Directory - RTP, Licensing & Game Catalogues
I've catalogued every game studio powering the casinos in my database. Compare return-to-player rates, licensing credentials, game counts, and see which Canadian-friendly operators feature each provider's catalogue.
Provider overview
100
Game Providers
96.2%
Average RTP
1,712
Casino Integrations
15yr
Avg Experience
Tier Distribution
A-Tier
6
B-Tier
25
C-Tier
62
D-Tier
7
Game Type Coverage
Slots
92
Table Games
82
Game Shows
23
Live Dealer
22
Video Poker
13
Virtual Sports
7
Crash Games
6
Scratch Cards
6
Casino Game Providers - All Studios
100 providers found
Sort by:
Features:
Search:
View:

Iron Dog Studio
Tier CEst. 2011✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
26
casinos

Kalamba Games
Tier CEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
24
casinos

Evoplay
Tier CEst. 2013✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
5
23
casinos

Fugaso
Tier CEst. 2008✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
3
22
casinos

Platipus Gaming
Tier CEst. 2009✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
21
casinos

Fantasma Games
Tier CEst. 2018✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
20
casinos

SmartSoft Gaming
Tier CEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
3
18
casinos

Swintt
Tier CEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
2
16
casinos

Triple Edge Studios
Tier CEst. 2008✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
16
casinos

Belatra
Tier CEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
2
15
casinos

Mascot Gaming
Tier CEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
15
casinos

Booongo
Tier CEst. 2015✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
14
casinos

Vivo Gaming
Tier CEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
97.2%
Game Types
2
14
casinos

Fortune Factory Studios
Tier CEst. 2017✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
13
casinos

Felix Gaming
Tier CEst. 2019✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
11
casinos

Alchemy Gaming
Tier CEst. 2009✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
10
casinos

Gamomat
Tier CEst. 2009✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
2
9
casinos

Apollo Games
Tier CEst. 2009✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
8
casinos

Foxium
Tier CEst. 2017✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
8
casinos

Pulse 8 Studios
Tier CEst. 2018✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
8
casinos
Showing 41-60 of 100 providers
Provider Insights
Updated daily from our live casino catalogue data
Most Popular
Evolution
Found in 52 casinos
Most Versatile Studios
Playtech7 typesPragmatic Play7 typesMicrogaming6 typesCovering the widest range of game categories
Industry Veterans
Providers with 15+ years of industry experience
Game Providers Ranked by Tier
A data-backed breakdown of studio quality and market presence
Tier A - Top-Tier Studios
Studios with the most extensive game libraries, best published RTPs, and widest availability across casinos in my database.
Tier B - Established Developers
Reliable studios with years of experience and well-rounded game collections.
Tier C - Mid-Range Studios
Smaller developers finding their footing - consistent releases, more selective distribution.
Tier D - Niche & Up-and-Coming
Newer or region-specific studios with limited presence across the markets I monitor.
Compare Game Providers
Stack up studio performance - tier ranking, game library size, casino availability - all in one view
Provider | Tier | Average RTP | Casinos | Est. | RTP Audited | Game Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 52 | 2006 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 1975 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 1994 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 47 | 1996 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 20 | 1999 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 2007 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 29 | 2003 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.4% | 41 | 1998 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 46 | 2011 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 41 | 2002 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.1% | 42 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 97.8% | 33 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2005 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 42 | 2017 | |||
| B-Tier | 95.8% | 3 | 1992 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 27 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 40 | 2010 |
FAQ























