CasinoScraper Sign In
Argentina · EspañolBelgië · NederlandsBrasil · PortuguêsCanada · EnglishČeská republika · ČeštinaColombia · EspañolDanmark · DanskDeutschland · DeutschDominican Republic · EnglishEesti · Eesti keelEspaña · EspañolHrvatska · HrvatskiIreland · EnglishItalia · ItalianoLatvija · LatviešuLietuva · LietuviųMagyarország · MagyarMalta · MaltiMéxico · EspañolNederland · NederlandsNew Zealand · EnglishNorge · NorskÖsterreich · DeutschPerú · EspañolPolska · PolskiPortugal · PortuguêsRomânia · RomânăSchweiz · DeutschSlovenija · SlovenščinaSlovensko · SlovenčinaSrbija · SrpskiSuomi · SuomiSverige · SvenskaUnited Kingdom · EnglishΕλλάδα · ΕλληνικάБългария · БългарскиУкраїна · Українська
Software studios behind your favourite casino games
Casino Game Provider Directory - RTP, Licensing & Game Catalogues
I've catalogued every game studio powering the casinos in my database. Compare return-to-player rates, licensing credentials, game counts, and see which Canadian-friendly operators feature each provider's catalogue.
Provider overview
100
Game Providers
96.2%
Average RTP
1,712
Casino Integrations
15yr
Avg Experience
Tier Distribution
A-Tier
6
B-Tier
25
C-Tier
62
D-Tier
7
Game Type Coverage
Slots
92
Table Games
82
Game Shows
23
Live Dealer
22
Video Poker
13
Virtual Sports
7
Crash Games
6
Scratch Cards
6
Casino Game Providers - All Studios
100 providers found
Sort by:
Features:
Search:
View:

Wazdan
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
30
casinos

1x2 Gaming
Tier BEst. 2003✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
29
casinos

Playson
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
27
casinos

Rabcat
Tier BEst. 2006✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
21
casinos

Merkur Gaming
Tier BEst. 2005✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
5
casinos

Oryx Gaming
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
5
casinos

Realistic Games
Tier BEst. 2002✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
5
casinos

Kiron Interactive
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
3
casinos

Lightning Box
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
3
casinos

Novomatic
Tier BEst. 1992✓ Audited
Avg RTP
95.8%
Game Types
4
3
casinos

WMS
Tier BEst. 2002✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.1%
Game Types
2
3
casinos

Hacksaw Gaming
Tier CEst. 2019✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
38
casinos

Endorphina
Tier CEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
33
casinos

BGaming
Tier CEst. 2018✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
5
32
casinos

Tom Horn Gaming
Tier CEst. 2011✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
32
casinos

Booming Games
Tier CEst. 2014✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
31
casinos

Amatic Industries
Tier CEst. 1997✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
28
casinos

GameArt
Tier CEst. 2008✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
28
casinos

Habanero
Tier CEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
27
casinos

Spribe
Tier CEst. 2014✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
27
casinos
Showing 21-40 of 100 providers
Provider Insights
Updated daily from our live casino catalogue data
Most Popular
Evolution
Found in 52 casinos
Most Versatile Studios
Playtech7 typesPragmatic Play7 typesMicrogaming6 typesCovering the widest range of game categories
Industry Veterans
Providers with 15+ years of industry experience
Game Providers Ranked by Tier
A data-backed breakdown of studio quality and market presence
Tier A - Top-Tier Studios
Studios with the most extensive game libraries, best published RTPs, and widest availability across casinos in my database.
Tier B - Established Developers
Reliable studios with years of experience and well-rounded game collections.
Tier C - Mid-Range Studios
Smaller developers finding their footing - consistent releases, more selective distribution.
Tier D - Niche & Up-and-Coming
Newer or region-specific studios with limited presence across the markets I monitor.
Compare Game Providers
Stack up studio performance - tier ranking, game library size, casino availability - all in one view
Provider | Tier | Average RTP | Casinos | Est. | RTP Audited | Game Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 52 | 2006 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 1975 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 1994 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 47 | 1996 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 20 | 1999 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 2007 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 29 | 2003 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.4% | 41 | 1998 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 46 | 2011 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 41 | 2002 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.1% | 42 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 97.8% | 33 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2005 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 42 | 2017 | |||
| B-Tier | 95.8% | 3 | 1992 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 27 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 40 | 2010 |
FAQ
















