CasinoScraper Sign In
Argentina · EspañolBelgië · NederlandsBrasil · PortuguêsCanada · EnglishČeská republika · ČeštinaColombia · EspañolDanmark · DanskDeutschland · DeutschDominican Republic · EnglishEesti · Eesti keelEspaña · EspañolHrvatska · HrvatskiIreland · EnglishItalia · ItalianoLatvija · LatviešuLietuva · LietuviųMagyarország · MagyarMalta · MaltiMéxico · EspañolNederland · NederlandsNew Zealand · EnglishNorge · NorskÖsterreich · DeutschPerú · EspañolPolska · PolskiPortugal · PortuguêsRomânia · RomânăSchweiz · DeutschSlovenija · SlovenščinaSlovensko · SlovenčinaSrbija · SrpskiSuomi · SuomiSverige · SvenskaUnited Kingdom · EnglishΕλλάδα · ΕλληνικάБългария · БългарскиУкраїна · Українська
Software studios behind your favourite casino games
Casino Game Provider Directory - RTP, Licensing & Game Catalogues
I've catalogued every game studio powering the casinos in my database. Compare return-to-player rates, licensing credentials, game counts, and see which Canadian-friendly operators feature each provider's catalogue.
Provider overview
100
Game Providers
96.2%
Average RTP
1,712
Casino Integrations
15yr
Avg Experience
Tier Distribution
A-Tier
6
B-Tier
25
C-Tier
62
D-Tier
7
Game Type Coverage
Slots
92
Table Games
82
Game Shows
23
Live Dealer
22
Video Poker
13
Virtual Sports
7
Crash Games
6
Scratch Cards
6
Casino Game Providers - All Studios
100 providers found
Sort by:
Features:
Search:
View:

Evolution
Tier AEst. 2006✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.8%
Game Types
5
52
casinos

Microgaming
Tier AEst. 1994✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
6
49
casinos

Pragmatic Play
Tier AEst. 2007✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
7
49
casinos

NetEnt
Tier AEst. 1996✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.8%
Game Types
3
47
casinos

Playtech
Tier AEst. 1999✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
7
20
casinos

IGT
Tier AEst. 1975✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
5
3
casinos

Quickspin
Tier BEst. 2011✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
1
47
casinos

Big Time Gaming
Tier BEst. 2011✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
46
casinos

Red Tiger
Tier BEst. 2014✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
45
casinos

Thunderkick
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.3%
Game Types
1
45
casinos

Yggdrasil
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
3
45
casinos

iSoftBet
Tier BEst. 2008✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
5
43
casinos

ELK Studios
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.1%
Game Types
2
42
casinos

Nolimit City
Tier BEst. 2017✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
42
casinos

Betsoft
Tier BEst. 1998✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.4%
Game Types
4
41
casinos

Blueprint Gaming
Tier BEst. 2002✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
41
casinos

Push Gaming
Tier BEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
40
casinos

Relax Gaming
Tier BEst. 2010✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
4
40
casinos

Ezugi
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
97.8%
Game Types
3
33
casinos

Spinomenal
Tier BEst. 2012✓ Audited
Avg RTP
96.2%
Game Types
2
33
casinos
Showing 1-20 of 100 providers
Provider Insights
Updated daily from our live casino catalogue data
Most Popular
Evolution
Found in 52 casinos
Most Versatile Studios
Playtech7 typesPragmatic Play7 typesMicrogaming6 typesCovering the widest range of game categories
Industry Veterans
Providers with 15+ years of industry experience
Game Providers Ranked by Tier
A data-backed breakdown of studio quality and market presence
Tier A - Top-Tier Studios
Studios with the most extensive game libraries, best published RTPs, and widest availability across casinos in my database.
Tier B - Established Developers
Reliable studios with years of experience and well-rounded game collections.
Tier C - Mid-Range Studios
Smaller developers finding their footing - consistent releases, more selective distribution.
Tier D - Niche & Up-and-Coming
Newer or region-specific studios with limited presence across the markets I monitor.
Compare Game Providers
Stack up studio performance - tier ranking, game library size, casino availability - all in one view
Provider | Tier | Average RTP | Casinos | Est. | RTP Audited | Game Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 52 | 2006 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 1975 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 1994 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.8% | 47 | 1996 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 20 | 1999 | |||
| A-Tier | 96.2% | 49 | 2007 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 29 | 2003 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.4% | 41 | 1998 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 46 | 2011 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 41 | 2002 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.1% | 42 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 97.8% | 33 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 3 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2005 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 42 | 2017 | |||
| B-Tier | 95.8% | 3 | 1992 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 5 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 27 | 2012 | |||
| B-Tier | 96.2% | 40 | 2010 |
FAQ










